123 Social Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2016 | PRISA Appendix • Benchmarking of other companies in the sector, both national and international. The information and results provided here refer to 2015, although in some specific cases information from previous years has also been provided for comparison, as this illustrates the Group’s evolution over time. It is to be hoped that this Sustainability Report 2016 will satisfy all its readers and as always, we welcome comments and suggestions via our permanently open channels of communication on the Group’s web p.e www.prisa.com. Guiding principles behind the Sustainability Report This Report provides reliable and balanced information on PRISA’s endeavours to meet the challenges raised by social responsibility. In keeping with the guidelines as set out by the Global Reporting InitiativeTM, the contents of this report reflect the following principles: Materiality The information should cover aspects that reflect the Group’s significant social, environmental and economic impacts, or those that would substantively influence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders. To meet this objective, the relevant data for the Group have been identified and categorized according to the established thresholds and the risks these pose for each of our companies. Stakeholder Inclusiveness Stakeholders are entities or individuals that can reasonably be expected to be significantly affected by PRISA’s activities. The company should endeavour to satisfy the demands and concerns of these groups through the improvement and maintenance of the quality of its products and activities. The reasonable expectations and interests of stakeholders are a basic point of reference for many of the decisions taken when drafting this report Sustainability Context The report should present the organization’s performance in the wider context of sustainability, and reflect how it contributes via its actions to matters of an environmental, social and economic nature. Completeness The Report’s coverage of the material topics and indicators and the definition of the report boundary should be sufficient to reflect significant economic, environmental, and social impacts over the course of 2015. Balance The Report should reflect both positive and negative aspects of organizational performance in order to provide an informed assessment of overall performance. Comparability The information is presented in such a way so that the stakeholders can analyse the evolution of organizational performance, and can do so with respect to other organizations. Accuracy The report should present information on management approach, and on economic, environmental, and so
Memoria 2016 EN_PRISA_20160315_V4 baja
To see the actual publication please follow the link above